Paris Review - The Art of Fiction No. 211, William Gibson
Wonderful interview with William Gibson (Neuromancer, Pattern Recognition), not least of which is this tidbit on how he approaches the craft of writing:
INTERVIEWER
How do you begin a novel?
GIBSON
I have to write an opening sentence. I think with one exception I’ve never changed an opening sentence after a book was completed.
INTERVIEWER
You won’t have planned beyond that one sentence?
GIBSON
No. I don’t begin a novel with a shopping list—the novel becomes my shopping list as I write it. It’s like that joke about the violin maker who was asked how he made a violin and answered that he started with a piece of wood and removed everything that wasn’t a violin. That’s what I do when I’m writing a novel, except somehow I’m simultaneously generating the wood as I’m carving it.
E. M. Forster’s idea has always stuck with me—that a writer who’s fully in control of the characters hasn’t even started to do the work. I’ve never had any direct fictional input, that I know of, from dreams, but when I’m working optimally I’m in the equivalent of an ongoing lucid dream. That gives me my story, but it also leaves me devoid of much theoretical or philosophical rationale for why the story winds up as it does on the page. The sort of narratives I don’t trust, as a reader, smell of homework.
There’s no three act structure, or noticeboards with post-it notes mapping out the course of the story. Merely the first sentence.
They don’t teach that in creative writing classes. If they did, the course wouldn’t last much longer than an hour.
6 notes
-
conceptbug liked this
-
creativityprocess reblogged this from bulentyusuf
-
formidableumbrage reblogged this from bulentyusuf and added:
I’d heard this before, unattributed to Gibson, then Warren Ellis posted about this on his site. The lucidity of this...
-
bguyle reblogged this from bulentyusuf
-
haikyo liked this
-
bulentyusuf posted this